According to the System of Islam, the definition of fardh (compulsory) is that the performer is praised and the one who abstains from it is condemned, whereas the definition of fard in The Islamic Personality, Volume 3, states that the person who neglects to perform the fardh deserves to be punished but there is no mention of the praising. So, what is the adopted definition?

The first part is: the Hizb has been working for over 60 years and has been working in difficult circumstances, rarely has any group been exposed to such circumstances as the Hizb, and not all members may be able to carry this trust and some of them leave (the party)... Why aren’t their circumstances taken into consideration and thus given excuses instead of taking against them "non-quiet" positions?

The second part of the question: Do the long years without reaching the aim mean the lack of effectiveness in seeking the Nusrah (support)?